Armenia vs Australia: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Armenia
66.67
in 2014
Australia
66.67
in 2014
Armenia rank
44th
Australia rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Armenia
- Australia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Australia, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 44th and Australia ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Australia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 66.67 | 13.33 | Australia |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Armenia or Australia?
- Armenia, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Armenia and Australia?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Australia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Armenia and Australia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Armenia ranks 44th and Australia ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.