Antigua and Barbuda vs Slovenia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15)
Antigua and Barbuda
66.67
in 2014
Slovenia, Republic of
66.67
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
44th
Slovenia, Republic of rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Slovenia, Republic of
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Slovenia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Slovenia, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 44th and Slovenia, Republic of ranks 44th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Slovenia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15), Antigua and Barbuda or Slovenia, Republic of?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Slovenia, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15) between Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia, Republic of?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Slovenia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 44th and Slovenia, Republic of ranks 44th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.