Antigua and Barbuda vs Romania: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Antigua and Barbuda
66.67
in 2014
Romania
66.67
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
44th
Romania rank
44th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Romania
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Romania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 44th and Romania ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 62.22 | 4.44 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Antigua and Barbuda or Romania?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Romania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Antigua and Barbuda and Romania?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Romania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Romania rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 44th and Romania ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.