Afghanistan vs Kazakhstan: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Afghanistan
11.11
in 2014
Kazakhstan
11.11
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
167th
Kazakhstan rank
167th
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Afghanistan
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 11.11 against 11.11 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 167th and Kazakhstan ranks 167th of 181 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.11 | 0 | 11.11 | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 11.11 | 11.11 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Afghanistan or Kazakhstan?
- Afghanistan, at 11.11 against 11.11 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Afghanistan and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Kazakhstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Kazakhstan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Afghanistan ranks 167th and Kazakhstan ranks 167th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.