Papua New Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 66.03 against 65.75 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.28.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 126th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 125th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 66.03 against 65.75 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.28, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 126th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 125th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.