Niger vs Paraguay: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Niger
65.4
in 2019
Paraguay
65.1
in 2019
Niger rank
125th
Paraguay rank
127th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Niger
  • Paraguay
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Niger currently reports 65.4 against 65.1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.3.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Niger ahead.

Niger ranks 125th and Paraguay ranks 127th of 188 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Niger or Paraguay?
Niger, at 65.4 against 65.1 in Paraguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Niger and Paraguay?
0.3, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Paraguay?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Niger and Paraguay rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Niger ranks 125th and Paraguay ranks 127th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.