Nepal vs Thailand: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Nepal
85.14
in 2019
Thailand
84.65
in 2019
Nepal rank
59th
Thailand rank
61st

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Thailand
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 85.14 against 84.65 in Thailand, a difference of 0.49.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Thailand ahead.

Nepal ranks 59th and Thailand ranks 61st of 188 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Nepal or Thailand?
Nepal, at 85.14 against 84.65 in Thailand as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Nepal and Thailand?
0.49, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Thailand?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Nepal and Thailand rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Nepal ranks 59th and Thailand ranks 61st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.