Micronesia (country) vs Oman: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 84.07 against 84 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 64th and Oman ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or Oman?
- Oman, at 84.07 against 84 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and Oman?
- 0.07, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Oman?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Oman rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 64th and Oman ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.