Micronesia (country) vs New Zealand: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 84.63 against 84 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.63.
Across all 6 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 64th and New Zealand ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Micronesia (country) or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 84.63 against 84 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Micronesia (country) and New Zealand?
- 0.63, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and New Zealand rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 64th and New Zealand ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.