Malta vs Singapore: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Malta
88.93
in 2019
Singapore
89.57
in 2019
Malta rank
47th
Singapore rank
46th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Malta
  • Singapore
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 89.57 against 88.93 in Malta, a difference of 0.64.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 46th of 188 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Malta or Singapore?
Singapore, at 89.57 against 88.93 in Malta as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Malta and Singapore?
0.64, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Singapore?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Malta and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Malta ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 46th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.