Lithuania vs Norway: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Lithuania
97.83
in 2019
Norway
96.97
in 2019
Lithuania rank
19th
Norway rank
22nd

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Norway
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 97.83 against 96.97 in Norway, a difference of 0.86.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 19th and Norway ranks 22nd of 188 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Lithuania or Norway?
Lithuania, at 97.83 against 96.97 in Norway as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Lithuania and Norway?
0.86, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Norway?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Lithuania and Norway rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Lithuania ranks 19th and Norway ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.