Japan vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 86.67 against 85.94 in Japan, a difference of 0.73.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 58th and Palestine, State of ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Japan or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 86.67 against 85.94 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Japan and Palestine, State of?
- 0.73, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Palestine, State of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 58th and Palestine, State of ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.