Israel vs Micronesia (country): Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 84 against 83.42 in Israel, a difference of 0.58.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 66th and Micronesia (country) ranks 64th of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Israel or Micronesia (country)?
- Micronesia (country), at 84 against 83.42 in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Israel and Micronesia (country)?
- 0.58, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Micronesia (country)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Micronesia (country) rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 66th and Micronesia (country) ranks 64th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.