Iran vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Iran
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Iran currently reports 66.2 against 65.75 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Iran ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 126th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Iran or Papua New Guinea?
- Iran, at 66.2 against 65.75 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Iran and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.45, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Iran and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Iran ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 126th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.