Honduras vs Libya: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Honduras
64.27
in 2019
Libya
64.66
in 2019
Honduras rank
129th
Libya rank
128th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Honduras
  • Libya
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Libya currently reports 64.66 against 64.27 in Honduras, a difference of 0.39.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 129th and Libya ranks 128th of 188 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Honduras or Libya?
Libya, at 64.66 against 64.27 in Honduras as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Honduras and Libya?
0.39, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Libya?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Honduras and Libya rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Honduras ranks 129th and Libya ranks 128th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.