Guinea-Bissau vs South Africa: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 59.64 against 59.6 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.04.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 146th and South Africa ranks 145th of 190 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 59.64 against 59.6 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and South Africa?
- 0.04, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 146th and South Africa ranks 145th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.