Georgia vs Malta: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Georgia
- Malta
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 90.07 against 88.93 in Malta, a difference of 1.14.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Malta ahead.
Georgia ranks 46th and Malta ranks 49th of 191 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Georgia or Malta?
- Georgia, at 90.07 against 88.93 in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Georgia and Malta?
- 1.14, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Malta rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Georgia ranks 46th and Malta ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.