Eswatini vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 93.87 against 92.92 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.95.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 36th and North Macedonia ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Eswatini or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 93.87 against 92.92 in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Eswatini and North Macedonia?
- 0.95, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 36th and North Macedonia ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.