Eswatini vs Greece: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Eswatini
92.92
in 2019
Greece
93.72
in 2019
Eswatini rank
34th
Greece rank
33rd

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Greece
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Greece currently reports 93.72 against 92.92 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.8.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 34th and Greece ranks 33rd of 188 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Greece?
Greece, at 93.72 against 92.92 in Eswatini as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Greece?
0.8, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Greece?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Greece rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Eswatini ranks 34th and Greece ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.