Eswatini vs Finland: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Eswatini
92.92
in 2019
Finland
92.44
in 2019
Eswatini rank
34th
Finland rank
36th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Finland
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 92.92 against 92.44 in Finland, a difference of 0.48.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 34th and Finland ranks 36th of 188 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Finland?
Eswatini, at 92.92 against 92.44 in Finland as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Finland?
0.48, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Finland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Finland rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Eswatini ranks 34th and Finland ranks 36th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.