El Salvador vs Malta: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Malta
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 89.76 against 88.93 in Malta, a difference of 0.83.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 47th and Malta ranks 49th of 191 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, El Salvador or Malta?
- El Salvador, at 89.76 against 88.93 in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between El Salvador and Malta?
- 0.83, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do El Salvador and Malta rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 47th and Malta ranks 49th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.