Ecuador vs Peru: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Ecuador
71.15
in 2019
Peru
71.25
in 2019
Ecuador rank
102nd
Peru rank
101st

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Peru currently reports 71.25 against 71.15 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 102nd and Peru ranks 101st of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Ecuador or Peru?
Peru, at 71.25 against 71.15 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Ecuador and Peru?
0.1, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 102nd and Peru ranks 101st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.