Cyprus vs Iceland: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Cyprus
88.44
in 2019
Iceland
86.71
in 2019
Cyprus rank
49th
Iceland rank
52nd

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cyprus
  • Iceland
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 88.44 against 86.71 in Iceland, a difference of 1.73.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 49th and Iceland ranks 52nd of 188 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Iceland?
Cyprus, at 88.44 against 86.71 in Iceland as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Iceland?
1.73, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Iceland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Cyprus and Iceland rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Cyprus ranks 49th and Iceland ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.