Costa Rica vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 77.6 against 77.35 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.25.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 81st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 82nd of 190 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Costa Rica or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Costa Rica, at 77.6 against 77.35 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Costa Rica and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.25, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 81st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 82nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.