Congo vs Tanzania: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Congo
19.68
in 2019
Tanzania
20.21
in 2019
Congo rank
181st
Tanzania rank
180th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Congo
  • Tanzania
05101520201420162019

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 20.21 against 19.68 in Congo, a difference of 0.53.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 181st and Tanzania ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Congo or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 20.21 against 19.68 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Congo and Tanzania?
0.53, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo and Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Congo ranks 181st and Tanzania ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.