China vs Iceland: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 86.71 against 86.5 in China, a difference of 0.21.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
China ranks 55th and Iceland ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, China or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 86.71 against 86.5 in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between China and Iceland?
- 0.21, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Iceland rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 55th and Iceland ranks 52nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.