Chile vs Jordan: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Chile
- Jordan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 80.56 against 79.03 in Jordan, a difference of 1.53.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 73rd and Jordan ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Chile or Jordan?
- Chile, at 80.56 against 79.03 in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Chile and Jordan?
- 1.53, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Jordan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Jordan rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Chile ranks 73rd and Jordan ranks 75th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.