Central African Republic vs Guinea: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Guinea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 52.36 against 47.82 in Guinea, a difference of 4.54.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 162nd and Guinea ranks 165th of 188 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Guinea?
- Central African Republic, at 52.36 against 47.82 in Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Guinea?
- 4.54, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Guinea rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 162nd and Guinea ranks 165th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.