Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Hong Kong, China: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 95.73 against 95.04 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.69.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 27th and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Hong Kong, China?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 95.73 against 95.04 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.69, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Hong Kong, China rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 27th and Hong Kong, China ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.