Bahrain vs Jordan: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Bahrain
78.68
in 2019
Jordan
79.03
in 2019
Bahrain rank
77th
Jordan rank
75th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bahrain
  • Jordan
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 79.03 against 78.68 in Bahrain, a difference of 0.35.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.

Bahrain ranks 77th and Jordan ranks 75th of 188 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Bahrain or Jordan?
Jordan, at 79.03 against 78.68 in Bahrain as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Bahrain and Jordan?
0.35, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Jordan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Bahrain and Jordan rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Bahrain ranks 77th and Jordan ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.