Bahamas vs Ghana: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Bahamas
53.07
in 2019
Ghana
54.84
in 2019
Bahamas rank
159th
Ghana rank
156th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Bahamas
  • Ghana
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 54.84 against 53.07 in Bahamas, a difference of 1.77.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ghana ahead.

Bahamas ranks 159th and Ghana ranks 156th of 188 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Bahamas or Ghana?
Ghana, at 54.84 against 53.07 in Bahamas as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Bahamas and Ghana?
1.77, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Ghana?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Bahamas and Ghana rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Bahamas ranks 159th and Ghana ranks 156th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.