Azerbaijan vs Mexico: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Azerbaijan
81.75
in 2019
Mexico
82.09
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
70th
Mexico rank
68th

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Mexico
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 82.09 against 81.75 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.34.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 70th and Mexico ranks 68th of 188 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Azerbaijan or Mexico?
Mexico, at 82.09 against 81.75 in Azerbaijan as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Azerbaijan and Mexico?
0.34, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Mexico?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Azerbaijan and Mexico rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 70th and Mexico ranks 68th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.