Armenia vs Turkey: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Armenia
91.73
in 2019
Turkey
91.63
in 2019
Armenia rank
42nd
Turkey rank
43rd

Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Armenia
  • Turkey
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 91.73 against 91.63 in Turkey, a difference of 0.1.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Turkey ahead.

Armenia ranks 42nd and Turkey ranks 43rd of 188 countries.

Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Armenia or Turkey?
Armenia, at 91.73 against 91.63 in Turkey as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Armenia and Turkey?
0.1, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Turkey?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Armenia and Turkey rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Armenia ranks 42nd and Turkey ranks 43rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.