Angola vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Angola
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Angola currently reports 36.15 against 32.05 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4.1.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Angola ranks 172nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Angola or Equatorial Guinea?
- Angola, at 36.15 against 32.05 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
- 4.1, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Angola ranks 172nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.