Afghanistan vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 32.05 against 30.63 in Afghanistan, a difference of 1.42.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score, Afghanistan or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 32.05 against 30.63 in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score between Afghanistan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.42, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with three sets of procedures of exporting and importing goods —documentary compliance, border compliance and domestic transport—within the overall process of exporting or importing a shipment of goods. The score for trading across borders is the simple average of the scores for the time and cost for documentary compliance and border compliance to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.