United Arab Emirates vs Viet Nam: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

United Arab Emirates
625 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Viet Nam
600 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
United Arab Emirates rank
174th
Viet Nam rank
177th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • United Arab Emirates
  • Viet Nam
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

United Arab Emirates currently reports 625 DB06-15 methodology against 600 DB06-15 methodology in Viet Nam, a difference of 25 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Viet Nam ahead.

United Arab Emirates ranks 174th and Viet Nam ranks 177th of 184 countries.

Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Arab Emirates Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 773.67 DB06-15 methodology 1,331 DB06-15 methodology 557.05 DB06-15 methodology Viet Nam
2010s 669.05 DB06-15 methodology 777.72 DB06-15 methodology 108.67 DB06-15 methodology Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), United Arab Emirates or Viet Nam?
United Arab Emirates, at 625 DB06-15 methodology against 600 DB06-15 methodology in Viet Nam as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between United Arab Emirates and Viet Nam?
25 DB06-15 methodology, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Viet Nam?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do United Arab Emirates and Viet Nam rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
United Arab Emirates ranks 174th and Viet Nam ranks 177th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Arab Emirates vs Viet Nam: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/united-arab-emirates/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/united-arab-emirates/viet-nam/">United Arab Emirates vs Viet Nam: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.