Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Kyrgyzstan
6,000 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Zimbabwe
6,160 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Zimbabwe rank
7th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200520092014

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 6,160 DB06-15 methodology against 6,000 DB06-15 methodology in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 160 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 184 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 5,736 DB06-15 methodology 5,111 DB06-15 methodology 625.01 DB06-15 methodology Kyrgyzstan
2010s 5,221 DB06-15 methodology 5,590 DB06-15 methodology 369.27 DB06-15 methodology Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Kyrgyzstan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 6,160 DB06-15 methodology against 6,000 DB06-15 methodology in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
160 DB06-15 methodology, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/">Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.