Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho, Kingdom of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Guinea-Bissau
2,006 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Lesotho, Kingdom of
2,045 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
48th
Lesotho, Kingdom of rank
47th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lesotho, Kingdom of
01.0k2.0k3.0k200520092014

How they compare

Lesotho, Kingdom of currently reports 2,045 DB06-15 methodology against 2,006 DB06-15 methodology in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 39 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 48th and Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 47th of 183 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Lesotho, Kingdom of Difference Ahead
2000s 2,282 DB06-15 methodology 2,123 DB06-15 methodology 159.7 DB06-15 methodology Guinea-Bissau
2010s 2,085 DB06-15 methodology 1,985 DB06-15 methodology 100.09 DB06-15 methodology Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Guinea-Bissau or Lesotho, Kingdom of?
Lesotho, Kingdom of, at 2,045 DB06-15 methodology against 2,006 DB06-15 methodology in Guinea-Bissau as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho, Kingdom of?
39 DB06-15 methodology, with Lesotho, Kingdom of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho, Kingdom of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Lesotho, Kingdom of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 48th and Lesotho, Kingdom of ranks 47th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho, Kingdom of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/guinea-bissau/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/guinea-bissau/lesotho/">Guinea-Bissau vs Lesotho, Kingdom of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.