Georgia vs Mozambique, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Georgia
1,595 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Mozambique, Republic of
1,600 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Georgia rank
69th
Mozambique, Republic of rank
66th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Georgia
  • Mozambique, Republic of
01.0k2.0k3.0k200520092014

How they compare

Mozambique, Republic of currently reports 1,600 DB06-15 methodology against 1,595 DB06-15 methodology in Georgia, a difference of 5 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 69th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 66th of 183 countries.

Mozambique, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mozambique, Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 1,927 DB06-15 methodology 2,094 DB06-15 methodology 167.46 DB06-15 methodology Mozambique, Republic of
2010s 1,650 DB06-15 methodology 1,754 DB06-15 methodology 103.92 DB06-15 methodology Mozambique, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Georgia or Mozambique, Republic of?
Mozambique, Republic of, at 1,600 DB06-15 methodology against 1,595 DB06-15 methodology in Georgia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Georgia and Mozambique, Republic of?
5 DB06-15 methodology, with Mozambique, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mozambique, Republic of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Georgia and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Georgia ranks 69th and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 66th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Mozambique, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/georgia/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/georgia/mozambique/">Georgia vs Mozambique, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.