Bolivia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Bolivia
1,745 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
1,730 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Bolivia rank
59th
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
60th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Bolivia
  • Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
01.0k2.0k3.0k200520092014

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 1,745 DB06-15 methodology against 1,730 DB06-15 methodology in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 15 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.

Bolivia ranks 59th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 60th of 184 countries.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) Difference Ahead
2000s 2,408 DB06-15 methodology 2,638 DB06-15 methodology 230.17 DB06-15 methodology Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
2010s 2,062 DB06-15 methodology 2,106 DB06-15 methodology 43.96 DB06-15 methodology Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Bolivia or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Bolivia, at 1,745 DB06-15 methodology against 1,730 DB06-15 methodology in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Bolivia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
15 DB06-15 methodology, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Bolivia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Bolivia ranks 59th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 60th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/bolivia/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/bolivia/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Bolivia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.