Albania vs Chinese Taipei: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

Albania
730 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Chinese Taipei
720 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Albania rank
162nd
Chinese Taipei rank
163rd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • Albania
  • Chinese Taipei
02505007501.0k200520092014

How they compare

Albania currently reports 730 DB06-15 methodology against 720 DB06-15 methodology in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 10 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Albania ahead.

Albania ranks 162nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 163rd of 183 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2000s 915.88 DB06-15 methodology 710.93 DB06-15 methodology 204.95 DB06-15 methodology Albania
2010s 745.01 DB06-15 methodology 717.48 DB06-15 methodology 27.53 DB06-15 methodology Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), Albania or Chinese Taipei?
Albania, at 730 DB06-15 methodology against 720 DB06-15 methodology in Chinese Taipei as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between Albania and Chinese Taipei?
10 DB06-15 methodology, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Chinese Taipei?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Albania and Chinese Taipei rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Albania ranks 162nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 163rd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Chinese Taipei: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/albania/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/albania/taiwan/">Albania vs Chinese Taipei: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.