United Arab Emirates vs Viet Nam: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
United Arab Emirates
95.44
in 2014
Viet Nam
95.89
in 2014
United Arab Emirates rank
10th
Viet Nam rank
8th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 95.89 against 95.44 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 10th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 184 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.8 | 82.91 | 9.89 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 94.66 | 92.73 | 1.93 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), United Arab Emirates or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 95.89 against 95.44 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between United Arab Emirates and Viet Nam?
- 0.45, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Viet Nam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Viet Nam rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 10th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.