East Timor vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

East Timor
99.17
in 2014
Tonga
97.66
in 2014
East Timor rank
1st
Tonga rank
3rd

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • East Timor
  • Tonga
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 99.17 against 97.66 in Tonga, a difference of 1.51.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tonga ahead.

East Timor ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 3rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, East Timor averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 91.06 92.66 1.6 Tonga
2010s 97.74 97.29 0.4514 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, East Timor or Tonga?
East Timor, at 99.17 against 97.66 in Tonga as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between East Timor and Tonga?
1.51, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Tonga?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do East Timor and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
East Timor ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.