Syrian Arab Republic vs Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Syrian Arab Republic
63.75
in 2014
Ukraine
62.95
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic rank
152nd
Ukraine rank
153rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Ukraine
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 63.75 against 62.95 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.8.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd and Ukraine ranks 153rd of 183 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.53 | 27.8 | 37.73 | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 72.89 | 58.85 | 14.05 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Syrian Arab Republic or Ukraine?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 63.75 against 62.95 in Ukraine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Syrian Arab Republic and Ukraine?
- 0.8, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Ukraine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 152nd and Ukraine ranks 153rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.