Sierra Leone vs Yemen: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Sierra Leone
78.57
in 2014
Yemen
78.84
in 2014
Sierra Leone rank
113th
Yemen rank
112th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Sierra Leone
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 78.84 against 78.57 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 112th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.1 | 56.12 | 5.99 | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 72.7 | 75.46 | 2.76 | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Sierra Leone or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 78.84 against 78.57 in Sierra Leone as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Sierra Leone and Yemen?
- 0.27, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Yemen?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Sierra Leone and Yemen rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 113th and Yemen ranks 112th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.