Seychelles vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Seychelles
94.56
in 2014
United Arab Emirates
95.44
in 2014
Seychelles rank
13th
United Arab Emirates rank
10th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Seychelles
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 95.44 against 94.56 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.88.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Seychelles ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 10th of 183 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.71 | 92.8 | 17.1 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 91.19 | 94.66 | 3.47 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Seychelles or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 95.44 against 94.56 in Seychelles as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Seychelles and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.88, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Seychelles and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Seychelles ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 10th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.