Senegal vs Serbia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Senegal
72.09
in 2014
Serbia
72.63
in 2014
Senegal rank
132nd
Serbia rank
130th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Senegal
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 72.63 against 72.09 in Senegal, a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Senegal ahead.
Senegal ranks 132nd and Serbia ranks 130th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Senegal averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.52 | 57.83 | 6.69 | Senegal |
| 2010s | 70.17 | 70.97 | 0.7943 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Senegal or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 72.63 against 72.09 in Senegal as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Senegal and Serbia?
- 0.54, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Serbia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Senegal and Serbia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Senegal ranks 132nd and Serbia ranks 130th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.