Sao Tome and Principe vs Viet Nam: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Sao Tome and Principe
96.3
in 2014
Viet Nam
95.89
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe rank
7th
Viet Nam rank
8th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 96.3 against 95.89 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.41.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.67 | 82.91 | 4.24 | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 93.87 | 92.73 | 1.14 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Sao Tome and Principe or Viet Nam?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 96.3 against 95.89 in Viet Nam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Sao Tome and Principe and Viet Nam?
- 0.41, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Viet Nam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Viet Nam rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 8th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.