What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Sao Tome and Principe and United Arab Emirates?

0.86, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and United Arab Emirates?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sao Tome and Principe vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)

Sao Tome and Principe

96.3

in 2014

United Arab Emirates

95.44

in 2014

Sao Tome and Principe rank

7th

United Arab Emirates rank

10th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time

Sao Tome and Principe
United Arab Emirates

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 96.3 against 95.44 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.86.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 10th of 184 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sao Tome and Principe	United Arab Emirates	Difference	Ahead
2000s	78.67	92.8	14.13	United Arab Emirates
2010s	93.87	94.66	0.7914	United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Sao Tome and Principe or United Arab Emirates?: Sao Tome and Principe, at 96.3 against 95.44 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Sao Tome and Principe and United Arab Emirates?: 0.86, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and United Arab Emirates?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?: Sao Tome and Principe ranks 7th and United Arab Emirates ranks 10th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/sao-tome-and-principe/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/sao-tome-and-principe/united-arab-emirates/">Sao Tome and Principe vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.