Romania vs Slovak Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Romania
80
in 2014
Slovak Republic
79.82
in 2014
Romania rank
103rd
Slovak Republic rank
104th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Romania
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Romania currently reports 80 against 79.82 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.18.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Romania ranks 103rd and Slovak Republic ranks 104th of 183 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.78 | 83.56 | 9.79 | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 78.91 | 79.13 | 0.2206 | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Romania or Slovak Republic?
- Romania, at 80 against 79.82 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Romania and Slovak Republic?
- 0.18, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Slovak Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Romania and Slovak Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Romania ranks 103rd and Slovak Republic ranks 104th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.